\u0130klim hakk\u0131nda yanl\u0131\u015f bilgiler, \u015f\u00fcphe tohumlar\u0131 ekerek ve bilimsel ger\u00e7eklerin kabul\u00fcn\u00fc azaltarak toplumu derinden etkiliyor. Bu olguyu \u00f6nlemek i\u00e7in Skeptical Science gibi siteler, k\u00fcresel \u0131s\u0131nma hakk\u0131nda yayg\u0131n yan\u0131lg\u0131lar\u0131 \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fctmeye y\u00f6nelik a\u00e7\u0131k ve anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r a\u00e7\u0131klamalar sunuyor. Farkl\u0131 karma\u015f\u0131kl\u0131k d\u00fczeylerinde haz\u0131rlanan bu yan\u0131tlar, konuya yeni ba\u015flayanlardan en bilgililere kadar geni\u015f bir kitleye hitap etmeyi ama\u00e7l\u0131yor.<\/p>\n
Bu siteyi ziyaret edenler aras\u0131nda yak\u0131n zamanda yap\u0131lan bir ankete g\u00f6re, kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131n neredeyse yar\u0131s\u0131, i\u00e7erikleri g\u00f6rmeden \u00f6nce iklim de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi ger\u00e7eklerine zaten ikna olmu\u015f durumdayd\u0131. Di\u011ferleri i\u00e7in sunulan a\u00e7\u0131klamalar, iklim mitlerine olan inanc\u0131 azaltmada etkili oluyor. Ancak, beklenmedik bir etki de g\u00f6zlemlendi: baz\u0131 yan\u0131tlar, baz\u0131 okuyucularda bilimsel ger\u00e7eklerin kabul\u00fcn\u00fc de azaltt\u0131. Bu sonu\u00e7, yerle\u015fik bilgilere olan g\u00fcveni peki\u015ftirmek i\u00e7in ileti\u015fim y\u00f6ntemlerinin uyarlanmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nemini vurguluyor.<\/p>\n
En belirgin faydalar, ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7ta en az do\u011fru alg\u0131lara sahip olan ki\u015filerde g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcyor. Bu, Skeptical Science gibi ara\u00e7lar\u0131n \u00f6zellikle iki t\u00fcr kitle i\u00e7in yararl\u0131 oldu\u011funu g\u00f6steriyor. Bir yandan, iklim konusunda daha iyi ileti\u015fim kurmak i\u00e7in bilgilerini derinle\u015ftirmek isteyenler. \u00d6te yandan, k\u00fcresel \u0131s\u0131nman\u0131n insan kaynakl\u0131 oldu\u011funu hala sorgulayan ancak yeni bilgilere a\u00e7\u0131k olanlar.<\/p>\n
Ara\u015ft\u0131rmac\u0131lar, ger\u00e7ekleri yanl\u0131\u015f bilgilerden ay\u0131rt edebilme becerisinin, ele\u015ftirel d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceyi g\u00fc\u00e7lendirmede hayati \u00f6neme sahip oldu\u011funu da vurguluyor. Mevcut yan\u0131tlar\u0131 iyile\u015ftirmek i\u00e7in, kullan\u0131lan dezenformasyon teknikleri hakk\u0131nda daha fazla a\u00e7\u0131klama eklemeyi \u00f6neriyorlar. Ama\u00e7, okuyucular\u0131 yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 arg\u00fcmanlara kar\u015f\u0131 daha donan\u0131ml\u0131 hale getirirken, iklim konular\u0131ndaki anlay\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 da peki\u015ftirmek. Bu ayarlamalar, dezenformasyonla m\u00fccadele ara\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 gelecekte daha etkili hale getirebilir.<\/p>\n
DOI\u00a0:<\/strong> https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5194\/gc-9-145-2026<\/a><\/p>\n Titre\u00a0:<\/strong> Quantifying the impact of Skeptical Science rebuttals in reducing climate misperceptions<\/p>\n Revue : <\/strong> Geoscience Communication<\/p>\n \u00c9diteur : <\/strong> Copernicus GmbH<\/p>\n Auteurs : <\/strong> John Cook; B\u00e4rbel Winkler; Collin J. H. M. Maessen; Timo Lubitz; Doug Bostrom; Dana Nuccitelli<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \u0130klim hakk\u0131nda yanl\u0131\u015f fikirlere verilen yan\u0131tlar ger\u00e7ekten g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleri de\u011fi\u015ftiriyor mu? \u0130klim hakk\u0131nda yanl\u0131\u015f bilgiler, \u015f\u00fcphe tohumlar\u0131 ekerek ve bilimsel ger\u00e7eklerin kabul\u00fcn\u00fc azaltarak toplumu derinden etkiliyor. Bu olguyu \u00f6nlemek i\u00e7in Skeptical Science gibi siteler, k\u00fcresel \u0131s\u0131nma hakk\u0131nda yayg\u0131n yan\u0131lg\u0131lar\u0131 \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fctmeye y\u00f6nelik a\u00e7\u0131k ve anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r a\u00e7\u0131klamalar sunuyor. Farkl\u0131 karma\u015f\u0131kl\u0131k d\u00fczeylerinde haz\u0131rlanan bu yan\u0131tlar, konuya yeni ba\u015flayanlardan en… Okumaya devam et \u0130klim hakk\u0131nda yanl\u0131\u015f fikirlere verilen yan\u0131tlar ger\u00e7ekten g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleri de\u011fi\u015ftiriyor mu?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,9,7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cevre","category-dezenformasyon","category-toplum","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/globalphilosophyreview.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/globalphilosophyreview.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/globalphilosophyreview.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globalphilosophyreview.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globalphilosophyreview.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/globalphilosophyreview.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21,"href":"https:\/\/globalphilosophyreview.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20\/revisions\/21"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/globalphilosophyreview.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globalphilosophyreview.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globalphilosophyreview.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}